Swint v. Chambers County Commission

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Robert B. McDuff (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Paul M. Smith (on behalf of the Respondents)
Paul R. Q. Wolfson (on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
93-1636
Petitioner: 
Swint et al.
Respondent: 
Chambers County Commission et al.
Opinion: 
514 U.S. 35 (1995)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Swint v. Chambers County Commission , 514 U.S. 35 (1995)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1636)
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Swint, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Wrote the majority opinion
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg