Oyez: California Department Of Corrections v. Morales, 514 U.S. 499 (1995), U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument

California Department Of Corrections v. Morales

Docket:	93-1462
Citation:	514 U.S. 499 (1995)
Petitioner:	California Department Of Corrections et al.
Respondent:	Morales

Case Media

Abstract

Argument:	Monday, January 9, 1995
Decision:	Tuesday, April 25, 1995
Issues:	Criminal Procedure, Ex Post Facto

Advocates

James R. Asperger	(on behalf of the Respondent)
James Ching	(on behalf of the Petitioners)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Decision: 7 votes for California Department Of Corrections, 2 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 1, Section 10: Ex Post Facto

Rehnquist

Stevens

O'Connor

Scalia

Kennedy

Souter

Thomas

Ginsburg

Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, California Department Of Corrections v. Morales, 514 U.S. 499 (1995),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1462/>
(last visited ).