United States v. Lopez

Media Items
United States v. Lopez - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
United States v. Lopez - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
John R. Carter (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Drew S. Days, III (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
93-1260
Petitioner: 
United States
Respondent: 
Lopez
Opinion: 
514 U.S. 549 (1995)
Categories: 
children, commerce clause, juveniles, education
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, United States v. Lopez , 514 U.S. 549 (1995)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1260)
Facts of the Case: 

Alfonzo Lopez, a 12th grade high school student, carried a concealed weapon into his San Antonio, Texas high school. He was charged under Texas law with firearm possession on school premises. The next day, the state charges were dismissed after federal agents charged Lopez with violating a federal criminal statute, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. The act forbids "any individual knowingly to possess a firearm at a place that [he] knows...is a school zone." Lopez was found guilty following a bench trial and sentenced to six months' imprisonment and two years' supervised release.

Question: 

Is the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act, forbidding individuals from knowingly carrying a gun in a school zone, unconstitutional because it exceeds the power of Congress to legislate under the Commerce Clause?

Conclusion: 

Yes. The possession of a gun in a local school zone is not an economic activity that might, through repetition elsewhere, have a substantial effect on interstate commerce. The law is a criminal statute that has nothing to do with "commerce" or any sort of economic activity.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Lopez, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 18 U.S.C. 922

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority, joined Kennedy's concurrence
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote a regular concurrence
Kennedy
Wrote a dissent, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Souter
Wrote a regular concurrence
Thomas
Voted with the minority, joined Breyer's dissent
Ginsburg
Wrote a dissent
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court