The Oyez Project: 1993 Term Arguments

ABF Freight System, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (No. 92-1550) - Oral Argument

Wed, 01 Dec 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Albright v. Oliver (No. 92-833) - Oral Argument

Tue, 12 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

American Dredging v. Miller (No. 91-1950) - Oral Argument

Tue, 09 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Associated Industries of Missouri v. Lohman (No. 93-397) - Oral Argument

Mon, 28 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Barclays Bank Plc v. Franchise Tax Board Of California (No. 92-1384) - Oral Argument

Mon, 28 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

Granderson, convicted for mail destruction, faced potential imprisonment of 0-6 months under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The district court sentenced him to five years of probation. When Granderson tested positive for cocaine, the court resentenced him under section 3565 of the U.S. Code. The section says that if a person serving a sentence of probation possesses illegal drugs, "the court shall revoke the sentence of probation and sentence the defendant to not less than one third of the original sentence." The district court interpreted the phrase "original sentence" to refer to the term of probation imposed (60 months), rather than the 0-6 month imprisonment range set by the Guidelines. The court resentenced Granderson to 20 months' imprisonment.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated Granderson's new sentence. Citing "lenity," the court agreed with Granderson that "original sentence" referred to the potential imprisonment range under the Guidelines, not to the actual probation sentence.

BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation, As Receiver Of Imperial Federal Savings Association (No. 92-1370) - Oral Argument

Tue, 07 Dec 1993 12:00:00 -0500

A Virginia trial court warned the United Mine Workers of America union to refrain from certain unlawful strike-related activities. Over the course of the next few months, finding that the union had disregarded the warning more than 400 times, the court fined them more than $64 million in what it termed civil fines, payable to the state of Virginia. After the strike was settled the court refused to cancel the fines, despite the fact that the strike settlement had called for their cancellation. The Court ruled that the fines were payable to the state, not the mining company, and that the settlement could not therefore cancel them. The Virginia Court of Appeals reversed, canceling the fines in accordance with the settlement agreement, but on further appeal the Supreme Court of Virginia reinstated the fines. It held that the union had been warned in advance and could have avoided the fines, meaning that it controlled its own destiny. The fines were therefore not criminal (imposing criminal fines would have required a jury trial) but instead civil, as the trial court had argued, because they were intended to maintain order and respect for the courts by encouraging compliance with a court order.

Board of Educ.Kiryas Joel Village School v. Grumet (No. 93-517) - Oral Argument

Wed, 30 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Boca Grande Club, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Company, Inc. (No. 93-180) - Oral Argument

Tue, 11 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

C & A Carbone, Inc. v. Town Of Clarkstown, New York (No. 92-1402) - Oral Argument

Tue, 07 Dec 1993 12:00:00 -0500

Three days after his arrest by local police on state narcotics charges, Pedro Alvarez-Sanchez confessed to the Secret Service that federal reserve notes found in his home were counterfeit. When he was subsequently charged with the federal offense of possession of counterfeit currency, Alvarez defended himself by claiming that the delay between his arrest on state charges and his presentment on the federal charge rendered his confession inadmissible. Alvarez cited 18 U.S.C. Section 3501(c), which pronounced separate charge-based confessions inadmissible if obtained after the first six hours of detention. On appeal from a reversal of a district court's decision to uphold the confession, the Supreme Court granted the United States certiorari.

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music (No. 92-1292) - Oral Argument

Tue, 09 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Caspari, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center v. Bohlen (No. 92-1500) - Oral Argument

Mon, 06 Dec 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Cavanaugh v. Roller (No. 92-1510) - Oral Argument

Mon, 08 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Central Bank Of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank Of Denver, N. A. (No. 92-854) - Oral Argument

Tue, 30 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

City Of Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund (No. 92-1639) - Oral Argument

Wed, 19 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Gottshall (No. 92-1956) - Oral Argument

Mon, 28 Feb 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Custis v. United States (No. 93-5209) - Oral Argument

Mon, 28 Feb 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Dalton, Secretary Of The Navy v. Specter (No. 93-289) - Oral Argument

Wed, 02 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Department Of Revenue Of Montana v. Kurth Ranch (No. 93-144) - Oral Argument

Wed, 19 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Department Of Revenue Of Oregon v. Acf Industries, Inc. (No. 92-74) - Oral Argument

Mon, 08 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Department Of Taxation And Finance Of New York v. Milhelm Attea & Bros., Inc. (No. 93-377) - Oral Argument

Wed, 23 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct Inc. (No. 93-405) - Oral Argument

Tue, 22 Feb 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department Of Labor v. Greenwich Collieries (No. 93-744) - Oral Argument

Mon, 25 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Dolan v. City of Tigard (No. 93-518) - Oral Argument

Wed, 23 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Elder v. Holloway (No. 92-8579) - Oral Argument

Mon, 10 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Farmer v. Brennan, Warden (No. 92-7247) - Oral Argument

Wed, 12 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Meyer (No. 92-741) - Oral Argument

Mon, 04 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Florence County School District Four v. Carter (No. 91-1523) - Oral Argument

Wed, 06 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

After Shannon Carter was classified as a learning disabled student, school officials met with her parents to formulate an individualized education program (IEP) as required under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Unhappy with the IEP developed by the school district, Shannon's parents challenged its appropriateness and enrolled her in a private school while their challenge was pending.

When state and local educational authorities concluded that the IEP was adequate, Shannon's parents sued in Federal District Court, claiming the school district had failed to provide a "free appropriate public education" as required by IDEA and demanding reimbursement for Shannon's education at the private school. The school district argued that the private school did not meet all the requirements of IDEA and therefore did not meet the "appropriate" standard. Because of it was not "appropriate," the school district argued, reimbursement was not required.

The District Court and the Fourth Circuit of Appeals both ruled against the school district, requiring it to reimburse Shannon's parents.

Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. (No. 92-1750) - Oral Argument

Wed, 08 Dec 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Harris v. Forklift Sys. (No. 92-1168) - Oral Argument

Wed, 13 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. sued 2 Live Crew and their record company, claiming that 2 Live Crew's song "Pretty Woman" infringed Acuff-Rose's copyright in Roy Orbison's "Oh, Pretty Woman." The District Court granted summary judgment for 2 Live Crew, holding that its song was a parody that made fair use of the original song. In reversing, the Court of Appeals held that the commercial nature of the parody rendered it presumptively unfair.

Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris (No. 92-2058) - Oral Argument

Thu, 28 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

After Digital Equipment Corporation and Desktop Direct, Inc. arrived at a settlement agreement in a trademark infringement suit, the federal District Court dismissed the case. Several months later, after Desktop claimed that Digital had misrepresented important facts during the settlement negotiations, the Court reopened the case and cancelled the agreement. Digital appealed, but the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to hear the case, holding that it was not immediately appealable under the guidelines laid out by the Supreme Court in Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463. The court held that the "right not to go to trial" claimed by Digital under the settlement was not sufficiently important to merit an immediate appeal and was different from immunity rooted in an explicit statutory or constitutional provision or compelling public policy rationale, the denial of which had been held immediately appealable.

Heck v. Humphrey (No. 93-6188) - Oral Argument

Mon, 18 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Holder, Individually And In His Official Capacity As County Commissioner For Bleckley County, Georgia v. Hall (No. 91-2012) - Oral Argument

Mon, 04 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Honda v. Oberg (No. 93-644) - Oral Argument

Wed, 20 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Howlett v. Birkdale Shipping Co., S. A. (No. 93-670) - Oral Argument

Wed, 20 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Ibanez v. Florida Department Of Business And Professional Regulation, Board Of Accountancy (No. 93-639) - Oral Argument

Tue, 19 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corp. (No. 92-1123) - Oral Argument

Tue, 12 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel T.B. (No. 92-1239) - Oral Argument

Tue, 02 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Harris Trust And Savings Bank, As Trustee Of The Sperry Master Retirement Trust No.2 (No. 92-1074) - Oral Argument

Tue, 12 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Johnson, Speaker Of The Florida House Of Representatives v. De Grandy (No. 92-519) - Oral Argument

Mon, 04 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

Lenard Ray Beecham was convicted in Federal District Court of violating 18 U.S.C. 922(g), which makes it illegal for a convicted felon to possess a firearm. Beecham argued that according to the statute's exemption clause ("Any conviction...for which a person...has had civil rights restored shall not be considered a conviction...") he was no longer a convicted felon because Tennessee had restored his civil rights. Prosecutors pointed to the statute's "choice of law clause," which states that "What constitutes a conviction...shall be determined in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction in which the proceedings were held." They argued that because Beecham's prior conviction was under federal law, no state could restore his right to possess a firearm.

The District Court ruled that a state could restore civil rights barred by a federal conviction, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the decision. The Fourth Circuit's rule conflicted with those of the Courts of Appeals for the Eighth and Ninth Circuits, which held that the since the exemption clause applied to "any conviction," it also permitted states to undo restrictions caused by federal convictions.

Key Tronic Corp. v. United States (No. 93-376) - Oral Argument

Tue, 29 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Company Of America (No. 93-263) - Oral Argument

Tue, 01 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Ladue v. Gilleo (No. 92-1856) - Oral Argument

Wed, 23 Feb 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Landgraf v. Usi Film Products (No. 92-757) - Oral Argument

Wed, 13 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Liteky v. United States (No. 92-6921) - Oral Argument

Wed, 03 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

Florence Dolan wanted a permit from the City of Tigard to expand her store and pave her parking lot. The city agreed to grant her permit on the condition that she dedicate part of her land for (1) a greenway along a nearby creek to help alleviate runoff from the pavement, and (2) a pedestrian/bicycle path to relieve traffic congestion from the city's growing business district.

Livadas v. Bradshaw, California Labor Commissioner (No. 92-1920) - Oral Argument

Tue, 26 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc. (No. 93-880) - Oral Argument

Thu, 28 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

McDermott, Inc. v. Amclyde (No. 92-1479) - Oral Argument

Tue, 11 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) employee James Gottshall observed a fellow worker, Richard Johns, die of a heart attack while on duty. Gottshall's boss postponed seeking medical assistance during Johns' heart attack, insisted that the crew keep working, and left the body at the work site for the remainder of the work day. Shortly after Johns's death, Gottshall was admitted to a psychiatric institution. Gottshall sued Conrail under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA) for exposing him to distressing circumstances which he claimed caused his illness. A District Court rejected the suit.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed and found that Gottshall's injuries were "genuine and severe." The Third Circuit contrasted the liberal injury recovery policy embodied in FELA over the more limited injury relief recovery policy embodied in common law standards, which often applied harsh tests to prove employee injury.

Conrail employee Alan Carlisle also filed a FELA action against Conrail. He claimed that Conrail subjected him to unsafe working conditions, which caused him stress and lead to health problems. Because the stress related health problems were foreseeable to Conrail, the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment for Carlisle.

Mcfarland v. Scott, Director, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (No. 93-6497) - Oral Argument

Tue, 29 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (No. 93-356) - Oral Argument

Mon, 21 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. (No. 93-609) - Oral Argument

Tue, 26 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

National Organization for Women (NOW) v. Scheidler (No. 92-780) - Oral Argument

Wed, 08 Dec 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Nichols v. United States (No. 92-8556) - Oral Argument

Mon, 10 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. County Of Kent, Michigan (No. 92-97) - Oral Argument

Mon, 29 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver For American Diversified Savings Bank (No. 93-489) - Oral Argument

Mon, 21 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States (No. 92-903) - Oral Argument

Tue, 05 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Powell v. Nevada (No. 92-8841) - Oral Argument

Tue, 22 Feb 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

PUD No. 1 Of Jefferson County v. Washington Department Of Ecology (No. 92-1911) - Oral Argument

Wed, 23 Feb 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Romano v. Oklahoma (No. 92-9093) - Oral Argument

Tue, 22 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Schiro v. Farley, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison (No. 92-7549) - Oral Argument

Mon, 01 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

Karl Oberg was driving an all-terrain vehicle when it overturned, causing him severe, permanent injuries. The jury in his trial assessed almost $1 million in compensatory damages, and an additional $5 million in punitive damages. A 1910 amendment to the Oregon state constitution prohibited judicial review of jury awards.

Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corp. (No. 93-284) - Oral Argument

Mon, 28 Feb 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Shannon v. United States (No. 92-8346) - Oral Argument

Tue, 22 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Simmons v. South Carolina (No. 92-9059) - Oral Argument

Tue, 18 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Stansbury v. California (No. 93-5770) - Oral Argument

Wed, 30 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Staples v. United States (No. 92-1441) - Oral Argument

Tue, 30 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Tennessee v. Middlebrooks (No. 92-989) - Oral Argument

Mon, 01 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Thomas Jefferson University, Dba Thomas Jefferson University Hospital v. Shalala, Secretary Of Health And Human Services (No. 93-120) - Oral Argument

Mon, 18 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich, Secretary Of Labor (No. 92-896) - Oral Argument

Tue, 05 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Ticor Title Insurance Co. v. Brown (No. 92-1988) - Oral Argument

Tue, 01 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Tuilaepa v. California (No. 93-5131) - Oral Argument

Tue, 22 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Turner Broadcasting v. FCC (No. 93-44) - Oral Argument

Wed, 12 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

United Mineworkers of America v. Bagwell (No. 92-1625) - Oral Argument

Mon, 29 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

The National Organization for Women (NOW) sued a coalition of anti-abortion groups called the Pro-Life Action Network (PLAN) under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. N.O.W. alleged that Scheidler and other anti-abortion protesters were members in a nationwide conspiracy to obstruct women's access to abortion clinics through a pattern of racketeering activity including the actual or implied threat of violence. The District Court dismissed the suit, holding that the voluntary contributions are not proceeds of racketeering and that a "racketeering enterprise" must have an economic motive, a fact that NOW could not demonstrate. The Court of Appeals affirmed and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

United States Department Of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (No. 92-1223) - Oral Argument

Mon, 08 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

United States v. Alvarez-Sanchez (No. 92-1812) - Oral Argument

Tue, 01 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

United States v. Carlton (No. 92-1941) - Oral Argument

Mon, 28 Feb 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

United States v. Granderson (No. 92-1662) - Oral Argument

Mon, 10 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

United States v. Irvine (No. 92-1546) - Oral Argument

Mon, 06 Dec 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Victor v. Nebraska (No. 92-8894) - Oral Argument

Tue, 18 Jan 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Waters v. Churchill (No. 92-1450) - Oral Argument

Wed, 01 Dec 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Weiss v. United States (No. 92-1482) - Oral Argument

Wed, 03 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy, Commissioner Of Massachusetts Depart Ment Of Food And Agriculture (No. 93-141) - Oral Argument

Wed, 02 Mar 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Williamson v. United States (No. 93-5256) - Oral Argument

Mon, 25 Apr 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.