Home › Cases › 1990-1999 › 1993 › Stansbury v. California ›

Stansbury v. California

Media Items
Stansbury v. California - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Stansbury v. California - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
Aileen Bunney (on behalf of the Respondent)
Robert M. Westberg (on behalf of the Petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
93-5770
Petitioner: 
Stansbury
Respondent: 
California
Decided By: 
Rehnquist Court (1993-1994)
Opinion: 
511 U.S. 318 (1994)
Argued: 
Wednesday, March 30, 1994
Decided: 
Tuesday, April 26, 1994
Issues: 
Criminal Procedure, Miranda Warnings
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Stansbury v. California , 511 U.S. 318 (1994)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_93_5770)
(last visited Friday, March 19, 2010).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Stansbury, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Miranda Warnings

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a regular concurrence
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg

Per Curiam without Argument

Sponsor