Board of Educ.Kiryas Joel Village School v. Grumet

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Julie S. Mereson (Argued the cause for the state petitioner)
Nathan Lewin (Argued the cause for the school district petitioners)
Jay Worona (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
93-517
Petitioner: 
Board of Educ.Kiryas Joel Village School
Respondent: 
Grumet
Consolidation: 
No. 93-527
No. 93-539
Opinion: 
512 U.S. 687 (1994)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Board of Educ.Kiryas Joel Village School v. Grumet , 512 U.S. 687 (1994)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_93_517)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1989, the New York legislature passed a school districting law that intentionally drew its boundaries in accordance with the boundaries of the Village of Kiryas Joel, a religious enclave of Satmar Hasidim who practice a strict form of Judaism. Shortly before the new district commenced operations, the taxpayers and the association of state school boards embarked on a lawsuit claiming that the statute created a school district that limited access only to residents of Kiryas Joel.

Question: 

Did the 1989 statute violate the First Amendment's Establishment?

Conclusion: 

Yes. In a 6-to-3 decision, the Court held that the statute's purpose was to exclude all but those who lived in and practiced the village enclave's extreme form of Judaism. This exclusionary intent failed to respect the Establishment Clause's requirement that states maintain a neutral position with respect to religion, because it clearly created a school zone which excluded those who were non-religious and/or did not practice Samtar Hasidism. Indeed, the very essence of the Establishment Clause is that government should not demonstrate a preference for one religion over another, or religion over non-religion in general.

Decisions

Decision: 6 votes for Grumet, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Establishment of Religion

Sort by Seniority

Wrote a regular concurrence
Stevens
Wrote a regular concurrence, joined Stevens' concurrence
Blackmun
Wrote the majority opinion
Souter
Voted with the majority, joined Stevens' concurrence
Ginsburg
Wrote a special concurrence
Kennedy
Wrote a regular concurrence
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Thomas

Full Opinion by Justice David H. Souter