Turner Broadcasting v. FCC

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
H. Bartow Farr, III (Argued the cause for the appellants)
Drew S. Days, III (Argued the cause for the appellees)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
93-44
Appellee: 
FCC
Appellant: 
Turner Broadcasting
Opinion: 
512 U.S. 622 (1994)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Turner Broadcasting v. FCC , 512 U.S. 622 (1994)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_93_44)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1992, Congress passed the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. Sections 4 and 5 of this Act required cable systems to allocate a percentage of their channels to local public broadcast stations, the must-carry rules. The rules limit the cannels available for exclusive control by cable programmers and increase competition for the remaining channels.

Question: 

Are the must-carry rules content-based and thus a violation of the cable companies' First Amendment right to free speech?

Conclusion: 

No. The Court held that the must-carry provisions were content neutral, thus not a violation of the First Amendment. The rules were not determined by the programming content, but by broadcast method. The rules promote fair competition in television programming. Congress recognized that the public television stations had an intrinsic value to the American public and were in economic peril of disappearing due to the cable television industry's monopoly. The rules do not force the cable companies to alter their message.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Turner Broadcasting, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 47 U.S.C. 534

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a regular concurrence
Blackmun
Wrote a regular concurrence
Stevens
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Thomas
Wrote a dissent, joined O'Connor's dissent
Ginsburg

Full Opinion by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy