Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1993» Department Of Revenue Of Montana v. Kurth Ranch

Department Of Revenue Of Montana v. Kurth Ranch

Docket: 93-144
Citation: 511 U.S. 767 (1994)
Petitioner: Department Of Revenue Of Montana
Respondent: Kurth Ranch et al.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, January 19, 1994
Decision: Monday, June 6, 1994
Issues: Criminal Procedure, Double Jeopardy

Advocates

James A. Feldman (as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
James H. Goetz (on behalf of the Respondents)
Paul Van Tricht (on behalf of the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Kurth Ranch, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Double Jeopardy
Wrote a dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote the majority opinion
Stevens
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Full Opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Department Of Revenue Of Montana v. Kurth Ranch, 511 U.S. 767 (1994),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_93_144/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement