Home › Cases › 1990-1999 › 1993 › Department Of Revenue Of Montana v. Kurth Ranch ›

Department Of Revenue Of Montana v. Kurth Ranch

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
Paul Van Tricht (on behalf of the Petitioner)
James A. Feldman (as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
James H. Goetz (on behalf of the Respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
93-144
Petitioner: 
Department Of Revenue Of Montana
Respondent: 
Kurth Ranch et al.
Decided By: 
Rehnquist Court (1993-1994)
Opinion: 
511 U.S. 767 (1994)
Argued: 
Wednesday, January 19, 1994
Decided: 
Monday, June 6, 1994
Issues: 
Criminal Procedure, Double Jeopardy

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Department Of Revenue Of Montana v. Kurth Ranch , 511 U.S. 767 (1994)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_93_144)
(last visited Thursday, November 5, 2009).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Kurth Ranch, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Double Jeopardy

Sort by Ideology

Wrote a dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote the majority opinion
Stevens
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg

Full Opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens