Home › Cases › 1990-1999 › 1993 › Victor v. Nebraska ›

Victor v. Nebraska

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
Eric S. Multhaup (on behalf of the Petitioner Alfred Arthur Sandoval)
Donald B. Stenberg (on behalf of the Respondent Nebraska)
Daniel E. Lungren (on behalf of the Respondent California)
Mark A. Weber (on behalf of the Petitioner Clarence Victor)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
92-8894
Petitioner: 
Victor
Respondent: 
Nebraska
Consolidation: 
No. 92-9049
Decided By: 
Rehnquist Court (1993-1994)
Opinion: 
511 U.S. 1 (1994)
Argued: 
Tuesday, January 18, 1994
Decided: 
Tuesday, March 22, 1994
Issues: 
Criminal Procedure, Extra-Legal Jury Influences, Jury Instructions

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Victor v. Nebraska , 511 U.S. 1 (1994)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_92_8894)
(last visited Sunday, November 29, 2009).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Nebraska, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Due Process

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote a regular concurrence
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Blackmun's dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Wrote a special concurrence
Ginsburg

Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor