National Organization for Women (NOW) v. Scheidler

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Miguel A. Estrada (Argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal)
Fay Clayton (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
G. Robert Blakey (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
92-780
Petitioner: 
National Organization for Women (NOW)
Respondent: 
Scheidler
Opinion: 
510 U.S. 249 (1994)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, National Organization for Women (NOW) v. Scheidler , 510 U.S. 249 (1994)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_92_780)
Facts of the Case: 

The National Organization for Women (NOW) sued a coalition of anti-abortion groups called the Pro-Life Action Network (PLAN) under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. N.O.W. alleged that Scheidler and other anti-abortion protesters were members in a nationwide conspiracy to obstruct women's access to abortion clinics through a pattern of racketeering activity including the actual or implied threat of violence. The District Court dismissed the suit, holding that the voluntary contributions are not proceeds of racketeering and that a "racketeering enterprise" must have an economic motive, a fact that NOW could not demonstrate. The Court of Appeals affirmed and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Question: 

Does RICO require that an organization, to be defined as a racketeering enterprise, must be acting in pursuit of an economic motive?

Conclusion: 

The unanimous Court held that organizations without an economic motive can detrimentally "affect interstate or foreign commerce," satisfying the RICO definition of a racketeering enterprise. An "enterprise" does not have to be an economic organization or a principally criminal organization to trigger the RICO act. Consequently, the Court reversed the appeals court decision which allowed the original case to proceed.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for National Organization for Women (NOW), 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority, joined Souter's concurrence
Kennedy
Wrote a regular concurrence
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg

Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist