The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, February 23, 1994
Decision: Monday, June 13, 1994
Issues: First Amendment, Miscellaneous

Advocates

Paul Bender (On behalf of the United States as amicus curiae, supporting the respondent)
Jordan B. Cherrick (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Gerald P. Greiman (Argued the cause for the respondent)

Facts of the Case

Margaret Gilleo placed a 24-by-36-inch sign calling for peace in the Persian Gulf on her front lawn. The original sign disappeared and a subsequent sign was knocked down. She reported these incidents to the police who advised her that such signs were prohibited in Ladue. She sued the city and the District Court ordered a preliminary injunction. Ladue repealed the law and replaced it with a new one which also banned window signs. Gilleo then placed another anti-war sign in her second-story window and amended her complaint to challenge the new ordinance.

Question

Does the Ladue ordinance violate Gilleo's right to free speech as protected by the First Amendment?

Conclusion

Yes. Although acknowledging Ladue's police power to minimize visual clutter associated with signs, the Court ruled that the law "almost completely foreclosed a venerable means of communication that is both unique and important." The Court held a "special respect" for an individual's right to convey messages from her home.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Gilleo, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote the majority opinion
Stevens
Wrote a regular concurrence
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Full Opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Ladue v. Gilleo, 512 U.S. 43 (1994),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_92_1856/>
(last visited ).