Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1993» United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property

United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property

Docket: 92-1180
Citation: 510 U.S. 43 (1993)
Petitioner: United States
Respondent: James Daniel Good Real Property et al.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, October 6, 1993
Decision: Monday, December 13, 1993
Issues: Due Process, Hearing or Notice

Advocates

Edwin S. Kneedler (on behalf of the Petitioner)
Christopher J. Yuen (on behalf of the Respondents)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for James Daniel Good Real Property, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Due Process
Wrote a dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote a dissent, joined Rehnquist's dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined Rehnquist's dissent
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote a dissent
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Full Opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property, 510 U.S. 43 (1993),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_92_1180/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement