Home › Cases › 1990-1999 › 1993 › United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property ›

United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property

Media Items
Oral Argument
Expanded View
Advocates
Edwin S. Kneedler (on behalf of the Petitioner)
Christopher J. Yuen (on behalf of the Respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
92-1180
Petitioner: 
United States
Respondent: 
James Daniel Good Real Property et al.
Decided By: 
Rehnquist Court (1993-1994)
Opinion: 
510 U.S. 43 (1993)
Argued: 
Wednesday, October 6, 1993
Decided: 
Monday, December 13, 1993
Issues: 
Due Process, Hearing or Notice

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property , 510 U.S. 43 (1993)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_92_1180)
(last visited Sunday, November 22, 2009).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for James Daniel Good Real Property, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Due Process

Sort by Ideology

Wrote a dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote a dissent, joined Rehnquist's dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined Rehnquist's dissent
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote a dissent
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg

Full Opinion by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy