The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, March 23, 1993
Decision: Monday, May 24, 1993
Issues: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Firearms

Advocates

Thomas G. Hungar (Argued the cause for the United States)
Gary Kollin (By appointment of the Court, argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

John Angus Smith offered to trade an automatic weapon, a MAC-10, to an undercover officer for cocaine. Subsequently, he was charged with numerous firearm and drug trafficking offenses. Federal law imposes mandatory sentence enhancement penalties, specifically 30 years for a "machinegun", if a defendant "during and in relation to . . . [a] drug trafficking crime[,] uses . . . a firearm." A jury convicted Smith on all counts, which triggered the sentence enhancement. On appeal, Smith argued that the federal penalty for using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense covers only situations in which the firearm is used as a weapon, not as a medium of exchange. The Court of Appeals disagreed. It held that the plain language of the penalty does not require that a firearm be used as a weapon, but that it applies to any use of a gun that facilitates, in any fashion, the perpetration of a drug offense.

Question

Does trading a gun for drugs make a convicted defendant eligible for sentence enhancement under a federal law, which requires such treatment if the defendant "during and in relation to . . . [a] drug trafficking crime[,] uses . . . a firearm?"

Conclusion

Yes. In a 6-3 decision, authored by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court ruled that a criminal who trades his or her firearm for drugs "uses" it "during and in relation to . . . [a] drug trafficking crime," which is within the bounds of the sentence enhancement. Justice O'Connor wrote that Congress intended to make the word "use" as broad as possible when it wrote the law. The law does not require proof that a defendant used the gun as a weapon.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for United States, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 18 U.S.C. 924
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a regular concurrence
Blackmun
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Smith v. United States, 508 U.S. 223 (1993),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_91_8674/>
(last visited ).