Oyez: Itel Containers International Corp. v. Huddleston, Commissioner Of Revenue Of Tennessee, 507 U.S. 60 (1993), U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument

Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1992» Itel Containers International Corp. v. Huddleston, Commissioner Of Revenue Of Tennessee

Itel Containers International Corp. v. Huddleston, Commissioner Of Revenue Of Tennessee

Docket:	91-321
Citation:	507 U.S. 60 (1993)
Petitioner:	Itel Containers International Corp.
Respondent:	Huddleston, Commissioner Of Revenue Of Tennessee

Case Media

Abstract

Argument:	Wednesday, October 14, 1992
Decision:	Tuesday, February 23, 1993
Issues:	Economic Activity, State Tax

Advocates

Charles W. Burson	(on behalf of the Respondent)
Philip W. Collier	(on behalf of the Petitioner)
Edwin S. Kneedler	(on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)

Decision: 8 votes for Huddleston, Commissioner Of Revenue Of Tennessee, 1 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 3: Interstate Commerce Clause

Rehnquist

White

Blackmun

Stevens

O'Connor

Scalia

Kennedy

Souter

Thomas

Full Opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Itel Containers International Corp. v. Huddleston, Commissioner Of Revenue Of Tennessee, 507 U.S. 60 (1993),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_91_321/>
(last visited ).