Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches School District

Media Items
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches School District - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Jay A. Sekulow (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
John W. Hoefling (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
91-2024
Petitioner: 
Lamb's Chapel
Respondent: 
Center Moriches School District
Opinion: 
508 U.S. 384 (1993)
Categories: 
forum, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, first amendment, education
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches School District , 508 U.S. 384 (1993)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_91_2024)
Facts of the Case: 

A New York law authorized schools to regulate the after-hour use of school property and facilities. The Center Moriches School District, acting under the statute, prohibited the use of its property by any religious group. The District refused repeated requests by Lamb's Chapel to use the school's facilities for an after-hours religious-oriented film series on family values and child rearing. The Chapel brought suit against the School District in federal court.

Question: 

Did the District violate the First Amendment's freedom of speech when it denied Lamb's Chapel the use of school premises to show religious-oriented films?

Conclusion: 

Yes, by a unaminous vote. The Supreme Court's holding consisted of two parts. First, the District violated freedom of speech by refusing the Chapel's request to show movies on school premises solely because such movies were religiously oriented. While non-public schools are permitted under New York law to restrict access to their premises based on subject matter or speaker identity, such restrictions must be reasonable and "viewpoint neutral." In this case, the District's restriction was neither reasonable nor viewpoint neutral, since it allowed the presentation of all other views about family values and child rearing - except those which were presented from a religious perspective. Second, a grant of permission to the Chapel to use the District's premises would not have amounted to an establishment of religion. This is because the showing of the films would neither be school-sponsored during school hours nor closed to the public.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Lamb's Chapel, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote the majority opinion
White
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote a special concurrence
Scalia
Wrote a special concurrence
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority, joined Scalia's concurrence
Thomas

Full Opinion by Justice Byron R. White

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court