Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1992» Conroy v. Aniskoff

Conroy v. Aniskoff

Docket: 91-1353
Citation: 507 U.S. 511 (1993)
Petitioner: Conroy
Respondent: Aniskoff et al.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Monday, January 11, 1993
Decision: Wednesday, March 31, 1993
Issues: Civil Rights, Military Residency Requirements, Active Duty

Advocates

Kevin M. Cuddy (on behalf of the Respondents)
Robert H. Klonoff (on behalf of the Petitioner)
John F. Manning (on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae supporting the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Conroy, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 50 U.S.C. 525
Wrote the majority opinion
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a special concurrence
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Conroy v. Aniskoff, 507 U.S. 511 (1993),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_91_1353/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement