Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1991» City Of Burlington v. Dague

City Of Burlington v. Dague

Docket: 91-810
Citation: 505 U.S. 557 (1992)
Petitioner: City Of Burlington
Respondent: Dague et al.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, April 21, 1992
Decision: Wednesday, June 24, 1992
Issues: Attorneys' Fees

Advocates

Michael B. Clapp (on behalf of the Petitioner)
Barry L. Goldstein (on behalf of the Respondents)
Richard H. Seamon (on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for City Of Burlington, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Federal Water Pollution Control (Clean Water), plus amendments
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a dissent
Blackmun
Voted with the minority, joined Blackmun's dissent
Stevens
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, City Of Burlington v. Dague, 505 U.S. 557 (1992),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_91_810/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement