The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, March 4, 1992
Reargument: Wednesday, April 22, 1992
Decision: Monday, June 15, 1992
Issues: Economic Activity, State Tax

Advocates

Mary R. Hamill (on behalf of the Respondent)
Walter Hellerstein (on behalf of the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Allied-Signal, Inc., As Successor-In-Interest To Bendix Corp., 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 3: Interstate Commerce Clause
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote the majority opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Allied-Signal, Inc., As Successor-In-Interest To Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division Of Taxation, 504 U.S. 768 (1992),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_91_615/>
(last visited ).