Lucas v. South Carolina Coast Council

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
C. C. Harness, III (on behalf of the Respondent)
A. Camden Lewis (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
91-453
Petitioner: 
Lucas
Respondent: 
South Carolina Coast Council
Categories: 
police power, takings clause, environment, justiciability, property

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Lucas v. South Carolina Coast Council , 505 U.S. 1003 (1992)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_91_453)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1986, Lucas bought two residential lots on the Isle of Palms, a South Carolina barrier island. He intended to build single-family homes as on the adjacent lots. In 1988, the state legislature enacted a law which barred Lucas from erecting permanent habitable structures on his land. The law aimed to protect erosion and destruction of barrier islands. Lucas sued and won a large monetary judgment. The state appealed.

Question: 

Does the construction ban depriving Lucas of all economically viable use of his property amount to a "taking" calling for "just compensation" under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?

Conclusion: 

Yes. In a 6-to-2 decision, the Court relied on the trial court's finding that Lucas's lots had been rendered valueless by the state law. "[W]hen the owner of real property has been called upon to sacrifice all economically beneficial uses in the name of the common good...he has suffered a taking."

Decisions

Decision: 6 votes for Lucas, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Takings Clause

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a dissent
Blackmun
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Scalia
Wrote a special concurrence
Kennedy
Wrote a jurisdictional dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas

Full Opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia