Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1991» Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation

Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation

Docket: 90-727
Citation: 503 U.S. 258 (1992)
Petitioner: Holmes
Respondent: Securities Investor Protection Corporation et al.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, November 13, 1991
Decision: Tuesday, March 24, 1992
Issues: Judicial Power, Standing to Sue, Statutory Standing

Advocates

G. Robert Blakey (on behalf of the Respondents)
Jack I. Samet (on behalf of the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Holmes, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's concurrence
White
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's concurrence
Stevens
Wrote a special concurrence
O'Connor
Wrote a special concurrence
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Wrote the majority opinion
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice David H. Souter

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, 503 U.S. 258 (1992),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_90_727/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement