Burson v. Freeman

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Charles W. Burson (Petitioner, argued the cause, pro se)
John E. Herbison (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
90-1056
Petitioner: 
Burson
Respondent: 
Freeman
Opinion: 
504 U.S. 191 (1992)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Burson v. Freeman , 504 U.S. 191 (1992)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_90_1056)
Facts of the Case: 

Freeman, a Tennessee political campaign treasurer, challenged the constitutionality of the Tennessee Code forbidding the solicitation of votes and the display or distribution of campaign materials within 100 feet of entrances to polling facilities. On appeal from a lower court's dismissal, the Tennessee Supreme Court reversed, finding that the 100-foot ban was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court granted Burson certiorari.

Question: 

Did Tennessee's 100-foot limit violate the First Amendment's freedom of speech?

Conclusion: 

No. After subjecting Tennessee's statute to exacting scrutiny, since it constituted a facial content-based restriction on political speech in a public forum, the Court held that the statute was narrowly drafted to serve a compelling state interest. By creating a safe zone around polling sites, the statute served the state's interest in protecting its citizen's right to vote freely and effectively. Moreover, the 100-foot zone was acceptable since it was not so large as to completely block out the presence of political messages.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Burson, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote the judgment of the Court
Blackmun
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
O'Connor
Wrote a special concurrence
Scalia
Wrote a regular concurrence
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
Souter
Did not participate
Thomas

Judgment of the Court by Justice Harry A. Blackmun