Cipollone v. Liggett Group

Media Items
Cipollone v. Liggett Group - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Cipollone v. Liggett Group - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Cipollone v. Liggett Group - Oral Reargument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Marc Z. Edell (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Laurence H. Tribe (Reargued the cause for the petitioner)
H. Bartow Farr, III (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
90-1038
Petitioner: 
Cipollone
Respondent: 
Liggett Group
Opinion: 
505 U.S. 504 (1992)
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Cipollone v. Liggett Group , 505 U.S. 504 (1992)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_90_1038)
Facts of the Case: 

Rose Cipollone died at 58 from lung cancer. She smoked for 42 years. Before her death, she and her husband sued several cigarette manufacturers in federal court for damages resulting from Mrs. Cipollone lung cancer. A trial court judgment of $400,000 was reserved in the U.S. Court of Appeals. The Cipollone family appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Question: 

Do federally mandated cigarette warnings pre-empt the Cipollones' common law claims against cigarette manufacturers?

Conclusion: 

In a complicated 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that federally mandated warnings do not bar smokers from suing manufacturers under state personal-injury laws. The justices ruled that such suits cannot be based on claims that cigarette advertising failed to warn smokers of smoking dangers. But the justices also ruled that individuals may press claims alleging that the tobacco companies made fraudulent or inaccurate statements in their advertising or that the companies conspired to mislead people about the health hazards of smoking.

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Cipollone, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 15 U.S.C. 1331

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a special concurrence
Blackmun
Wrote the majority opinion
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority, joined Blackmun's concurrence
Kennedy
Voted with the majority, joined Blackmun's concurrence
Souter
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Thomas

Full Opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court