Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1991» Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.

Docket: 90-1029
Citation: 504 U.S. 451 (1992)
Petitioner: Eastman Kodak Co.
Respondent: Image Technical Services, Inc., et al.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, December 10, 1991
Decision: Monday, June 8, 1992
Issues: Economic Activity, Antitrust

Advocates

James A. Hennefer (on behalf of the Respondents)
Donn P. Pickett (on behalf of the Petitioner)
James F. Rill (as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for Image Technical Services, Inc., 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Appellate Procedure (or relevant rules of a circuit court)
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote the majority opinion
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Harry A. Blackmun

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (1992),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_90_1029/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement