Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1990» Primate Protection League v. Tulane Ed. Fund

Primate Protection League v. Tulane Ed. Fund

Docket: 90-89
Citation: 500 U.S. 72 (1991)
Petitioner: Primate Protection League
Respondent: Tulane Ed. Fund

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, March 20, 1991
Decision: Monday, May 20, 1991
Issues: Judicial Power, Standing to Sue, Adversary Parties

Advocates

Richard H. Seamon (on behalf of the Respondents)
Margaret E. Woodward (on behalf of the Petitioners)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 8 votes for Primate Protection League, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 3, Section 2, Paragraph 1: Case or Controversy Requirement
Did not participate
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote the majority opinion
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Full Opinion by Justice Thurgood Marshall

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Primate Protection League v. Tulane Ed. Fund, 500 U.S. 72 (1991),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/1990_90_89/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement