Home › Cases › 1990-1999 › 1990 › Primate Protection League v. Tulane Ed. Fund ›

Primate Protection League v. Tulane Ed. Fund

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
Richard H. Seamon (on behalf of the Respondents)
Margaret E. Woodward (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
90-89
Petitioner: 
Primate Protection League
Respondent: 
Tulane Ed. Fund
Decided By: 
Rehnquist Court (1990-1991)
Opinion: 
500 U.S. 72 (1991)
Argued: 
Wednesday, March 20, 1991
Decided: 
Monday, May 20, 1991
Issues: 
Judicial Power, Jurisdiction of Federal Courts; Judicial Power, Jurisdiction of Federal Courts; Judicial Power, Standing to Sue, Adversary Parties

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Primate Protection League v. Tulane Ed. Fund , 500 U.S. 72 (1991)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/1990_90_89)
(last visited Sunday, November 29, 2009).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 8 votes for Primate Protection League, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Article 3, Section 2, Paragraph 1: Case or Controversy Requirement

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote the majority opinion
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Did not participate
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter

Full Opinion by Justice Thurgood Marshall