Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1990» Astoria Federal S. & L. Ass'n. v. Solimino

Astoria Federal S. & L. Ass'n. v. Solimino

Docket: 89-1895
Citation: 501 U.S. 104 (1991)
Petitioner: Astoria Federal S. & L. Ass'n.
Respondent: Solimino

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, April 17, 1991
Decision: Monday, June 10, 1991
Issues: Civil Rights, Employment Discrimination

Advocates

Leonard N. Flamm (on behalf of the Respondent)
Paul J. Siegel (on behalf of the Petitioner)
Amy L. Wax (as amicus curiae supporting Respondent (pro hac vice))

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Solimino, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Age Discrimination in Employment (ADEA)
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Wrote the majority opinion
Souter
Full Opinion by Justice David H. Souter

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Astoria Federal S. & L. Ass'n. v. Solimino, 501 U.S. 104 (1991),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/1990_89_1895/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement