Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1990» Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Haslip

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Haslip

Docket: 89-1279
Citation: 499 U.S. 1 (1991)
Petitioner: Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.
Respondent: Haslip

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, October 3, 1990
Decision: Monday, March 4, 1991
Issues: Economic Activity, Punitive Damages Liability

Advocates

Bruce A. Beckman (on behalf of the Petitioner)
Bruce J. Ennis, Jr. (on behalf of the Respondents)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for Haslip, 1 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Due Process
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor
Wrote a special concurrence
Kennedy
Wrote a special concurrence
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice Harry A. Blackmun

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Haslip, 499 U.S. 1 (1991),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/1990_89_1279/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement