Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1990» Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Train Dispatchers

Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Train Dispatchers

Docket: 89-1027
Citation: 499 U.S. 117 (1991)
Petitioner: Norfolk & Western R. Co.
Respondent: Train Dispatchers
Consolidated: No. 89-1028

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Monday, December 3, 1990
Decision: Tuesday, March 19, 1991
Issues: Economic Activity, Railroad Regulation

Advocates

Jeffrey S. Berlin (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Jeffrey P. Minear (on behalf of the Federal Respondents supporting the Petitioners)
William G. Mahoney (on behalf of the private Respondents)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for Norfolk & Western R. Co., 2 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Interstate Commerce, as amended
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
Marshall
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Train Dispatchers, 499 U.S. 117 (1991),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/1990_89_1027/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement