http://www.oyez.org/cases/1984/podcast U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org) en The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent http://www.oyez.org/cases/cases/1980-1989/1984/198484776/oral-argument-no-84-835 None Mon, 22 Apr 1985 13:00:00 +0000 admin 60573 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_363/argument Certain bank holding companies located principally in either Connecticut or Massachusetts applied to the Federal Reserve Board (Board) to obtain approval for acquisitions of banks or bank holding companies (banks) in the other state. If a bank from one state seeks to acquire a bank, or substantially all of a bank's assets, from another state, the Douglas Amendment to the Bank Holding Company Act (BHCA), 12 U.S.C. Section 1842(d), allows the Board to approve the acquisition only if it "is specifically authorized by the statute laws of the State in which such [acquired] bank is located." Massachusetts and Connecticut have substantially similar laws allowing out-of-state banks to buy in-state banks only if the out-of-state banks (1) have their principal place of business in another New England State, and (2) the other New England State accords equivalent reciprocal privileges. Certain banks from outside of New England opposed the acquisitions, but the Board found that the Douglas Amendment did not prevent their authorization, and approved them. Mon, 15 Apr 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81717 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_498/argument None Mon, 15 Apr 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81728 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1624/argument None Mon, 15 Apr 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81789 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_679/argument None Mon, 15 Apr 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81719 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2136/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81809 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_510/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81696 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_5743/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81753 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_571/argument None Wed, 27 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81790 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_433/argument None Tue, 26 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81756 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_165/argument None Tue, 26 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81785 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_497/argument None Tue, 26 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81779 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1961/argument None Tue, 26 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81804 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1935/argument None Mon, 25 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81723 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_351/argument None Mon, 25 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81799 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_438/argument None Mon, 25 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81775 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_5240/argument None Mon, 25 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81747 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_476/argument None Wed, 20 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81745 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_48/argument None Wed, 20 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81767 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2126/argument None Wed, 20 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81704 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2032/argument None Wed, 20 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81697 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_5059/argument None Tue, 19 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81755 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_5108/argument None Tue, 19 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81706 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_261/argument The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the Commission) filed a complaint against the Chicago Discount Commodity Brokers (CDCB), alleging violations of the Commodity Exchange Act. CDCB was going through bankruptcy at the time and a trustee was appointed At a deposition related to the Commission’s lawsuit, Gary Weintraub, CDCB’s former counsel, refused to answer certain questions, citing attorney-client privilege. The Commission obtained a waiver of attorney-client privilege from the CDCB’s bankruptcy trustee. The district court directed Weintraub to answer the questions, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed, holding that a bankruptcy trustee does not have the power to waive attorney-client privilege for communications that occurred before the filing of the bankruptcy petition. Tue, 19 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81731 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_592/argument None Tue, 19 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81793 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_468/reargument In 1980, Cleburne Living Center, Inc. submitted a permit application to operate a home for the mentally retarded. The city council of Cleburne voted to deny the special use permit, acting pursuant to a municipal zoning ordinance. Mon, 18 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81819 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_465/argument None Mon, 18 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81690 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1569/argument None Mon, 18 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81748 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2143/argument None Mon, 18 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81759 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_468/argument In 1980, Cleburne Living Center, Inc. submitted a permit application to operate a home for the mentally retarded. The city council of Cleburne voted to deny the special use permit, acting pursuant to a municipal zoning ordinance. Mon, 18 Mar 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81707 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_335/argument None Wed, 27 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81703 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_249/argument None Wed, 27 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81739 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2148/argument None Wed, 27 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81718 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1894/argument None Wed, 27 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81783 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_325/argument None Tue, 26 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81727 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_16/argument None Tue, 26 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81742 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_76/argument None Tue, 26 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81817 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_127/argument None Tue, 26 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81689 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_233/argument None Mon, 25 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81698 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_6607/argument None Mon, 25 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81786 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_194/argument None Mon, 25 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81693 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_68/argument None Mon, 25 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81726 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_231/argument None Wed, 20 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81806 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_262/argument None Wed, 20 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81736 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_28/argument None Wed, 20 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81715 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_277/argument None Wed, 20 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81708 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1368/argument None Tue, 19 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81716 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_6663/argument None Tue, 19 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81791 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_312/argument None Tue, 19 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81761 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_4/argument None Tue, 19 Feb 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81737 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1748/argument None Wed, 16 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81795 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_9/argument None Wed, 16 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81778 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1750/argument An indictment issued by a grand jury charged James Miller with fraud. The indictment alleged he conspired with a burglar and overstated the value of the stolen items so his insurer would pay him more in damages recovery. The prosecution presented evidence proving that Miller had overstated the value of the items but did not try to establish that he had conspired with the burglar. The jury found his overstatement of value sufficient to convict him of fraud. Miller argued that by convicting him despite the fact that the prosecutors only addressed part of the indictment, the jury violated his Fifth Amendment right to be tried only on a grand jury indictment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed and reversed his conviction. Wed, 16 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81771 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1842/argument None Wed, 16 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81732 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2161/argument None Tue, 15 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81777 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1785/argument None Tue, 15 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81774 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1807/argument None Tue, 15 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81814 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1492/argument None Tue, 15 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81733 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2030/argument None Mon, 14 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81788 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2146/argument None Mon, 14 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81691 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_82_1889/argument None Mon, 14 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81688 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1545/argument None Mon, 14 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81700 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1329/argument None Wed, 09 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81749 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_6766/argument None Wed, 09 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81743 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2129/argument None Wed, 09 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81818 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_5004/argument None Wed, 09 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81765 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2064/argument None Tue, 08 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81699 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1919/argument None Tue, 08 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81760 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_2097/argument None Tue, 08 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81692 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1798/argument None Tue, 08 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81772 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1944/argument None Mon, 07 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81813 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1673/argument None Mon, 07 Jan 1985 13:00:00 +0000 81792 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_990/argument None Wed, 05 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81810 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_237/argument Part of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 authorized local institutions to receive funds to assist educationally deprived children from low-income families. Since 1966, New York City had used portions of its Title I funding to pay salaries of employees who teach in parochial schools. Wed, 05 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81796 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1437/argument None Wed, 05 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81801 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_812/argument An Alabama law authorized teachers to conduct regular religious prayer services and activities in school classrooms during the school day. Three of Jaffree's children attended public schools in Mobile. Tue, 04 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81702 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1452/argument None Tue, 04 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81695 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1075/argument None Tue, 04 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81757 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1708/argument None Tue, 04 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81754 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1362/argument James Loudermill stated on his application for employment with the Cleveland Board of Education that he had never been convicted for a felony. After hiring him as a security guard, the board discovered that he had been convicted for grand larceny and without further consideration fired him for providing false information on his application. Since Loudermill qualified as a "classified civil servant" under Ohio law, he obtained a property right to his employment. This meant he could only be dismissed for cause and could obtain an administrative review of the causes for his termination. The Cleveland Civil Service Commission granted him an administrative review after his termination and found it valid. Loudermill filed suit in District Court alleging that the review system was unconstitutional because it only allowed him to respond to the charges against him after his termination. He argued that the board removed his property without giving him a chance to defend himself in violation of his right to Due Process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The District Court agreed that the Ohio statute gave Loudermill a property right to his job, but ruled that the board did not violate his due process rights because it followed the procedures specified by the same statute for removing the property right. In a similar case, Richard Donnelly alleged that post- dismissal hearings violated his due process rights. The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard both cases together and ruled that the board violated both defendants' due process rights by removing their property rights to employment before providing an opportunity for them to respond to charges against them. Mon, 03 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81773 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1623/argument None Mon, 03 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81802 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_5954/argument None Mon, 03 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81710 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1878/argument Several prison inmates convicted of capital offenses and sentenced to death by lethal injection petitioned the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) alleging that the drugs to be used for their executions were not approved for use in human executions and therefore violated the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). When the FDA denied enforcement, the inmates brought suit claiming violations of the FDCA and requesting that the FDA be required to take enforcement actions. The district court granted summary judgment to the FDA holding that decisions declining to initiate enforcement proceedings were not judicially reviewable. The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed, finding that the decision not to begin an enforcement action was judicially reviewable under 5 U.S.C. Section 701(a)(2) and an abuse of discretion. Mon, 03 Dec 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81712 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1015/argument None Wed, 28 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81787 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1032/argument In 1975, the National Conservative Political Action Committee (NCPAC) was accused by both the Democratic Party of the United States and the Federal Election Commission of violating the Federal Election Campaign Act. The Act stipulated that independent political action committees could not spend more than $1,000 to support the election of a presidential candidate. This case was decided together with Democratic Party v. NCPAC. Wed, 28 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81735 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1590/argument None Wed, 28 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81722 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1625/argument None Wed, 28 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81797 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_82_2157/argument None Tue, 27 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81720 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_963/argument None Tue, 27 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81807 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1660/argument None Tue, 27 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81800 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_529/argument None Tue, 27 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81808 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_35_orig/argument None Mon, 26 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81741 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_82_1922/argument None Mon, 26 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81781 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_9_orig/argument None Mon, 26 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81725 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_82_1832/argument None Mon, 26 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81811 at http://www.oyez.org /cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1158/argument Donald E. Thornton worked as a supervisor in the Caldor department store chain. A devout Presbyterian, Thornton asked to be excused from working Sundays at the company's store in Torrington, Connecticut. The store required its managers to work one of every four Sundays, although rank-and-file employees were exempt under their union contract from Sunday work. In 1979, the company refused to allow Thornton to take off Sundays but offered him a transfer to another store, an hour away in Massachusetts, that was closed on Sundays. When he turned that down, the company said it would demote him from his manager's job and cut his hourly pay from $6.46 to $3.50. Thornton had worked Sundays for nearly eight months before he became aware the store was violating Connecticut law giving employees an absolute right not to work on their chosen Sabbath. He filed a grievance against Caldor with the state board of mediation. The board ruled in his favor. The state supreme court reversed. Thornton's estate (Thornton died in 1982) petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari. Wed, 07 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81713 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1632/argument In 1977, former President Gerald Ford contracted with Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. to publish his memoirs. Harper & Row negotiated a prepublication agreement with Time Magazine for the right to excerpt 7,500 words from Ford's account of his pardon of former President Richard Nixon. Before Time released its article, an unauthorized source provided The Nation Magazine with the unpublished Ford manuscript. Subsequently, The Nation, using approximately 300 words from the manuscript, scooped Time. Harper & Row sued The Nation, alleging violations of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976. The District Court held that The Nation's use of the copyrighted material constituted infringement. In reversing, the Court of Appeals held that Nation's use of the copyrighted material was sanctioned as a fair use. Tue, 06 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81762 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1292/argument Mr. Wayte was required by a 1980 Presidential Proclamation to register with the Selective Service system. Instead, he wrote letters to various government officials stating that he had not registered and did not intend to do so. Wayte's letters were added to a file kept by the Selective Service of men who had informed the government that they were not complying with the proclamation. The Selective Service later adopted a policy of passive enforcement, in which it would prosecute only men who had either reported to the government that they were not registering or whom other people had reported to the government for not registering. After a long series of requests by the government that Wayte register (all of which he failed to respond to), the government eventually indicted Wayte in federal district court for violating the Military Selective Service Act. The district court, however, dismissed the indictment, holding that the government's passive enforcement policy was unconstitutional because it amounted to selective prosecution of only those men who took an outspoken stance against the Selective Service. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Wayte had failed to show that the government focused its attention on him because of his protest activities. Tue, 06 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81734 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1394/argument None Tue, 06 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81764 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1013/argument None Tue, 06 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81769 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1622/argument None Mon, 05 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81816 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1330/argument None Mon, 05 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81738 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1476/argument None Mon, 05 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81729 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1307/argument None Mon, 05 Nov 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81758 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1334/argument None Wed, 31 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81780 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1274/argument None Wed, 31 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81803 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1007/argument None Wed, 31 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81750 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1466/argument None Wed, 31 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81701 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1620/argument None Tue, 30 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81812 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_240/argument None Tue, 30 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81724 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_859/argument None Tue, 30 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81782 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1035/argument None Tue, 30 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81711 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_703/argument None Mon, 29 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81770 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1416/argument None Mon, 29 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81763 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1360/argument None Mon, 29 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81815 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_832/argument None Mon, 29 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81751 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_6061/argument None Wed, 10 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81721 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1020/argument None Wed, 10 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81768 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1266/argument None Wed, 10 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81740 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1378/argument None Wed, 10 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81705 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1132/argument None Tue, 09 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81805 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1153/argument None Tue, 09 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81766 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_997/argument None Tue, 09 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81714 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1097/argument None Tue, 09 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81744 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_728/argument None Wed, 03 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81794 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_773/argument Michael James Elstad was suspected of committing a burglary and was picked up by police officers in his home. Before officers had given the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, Elstad made an incriminating statement. Once at the Sheriff's headquarters, Elstad was advised of his rights. Elstad then voluntarily executed a written confession. Wed, 03 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81784 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_912/argument None Wed, 03 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81776 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1170/argument None Tue, 02 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81709 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_469/argument None Tue, 02 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81798 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1427/argument None Tue, 02 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81746 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_727/argument None Mon, 01 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81730 at http://www.oyez.org http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1065/argument None Mon, 01 Oct 1984 13:00:00 +0000 81752 at http://www.oyez.org