Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1989» Hallstrom v. Tillamook County

Hallstrom v. Tillamook County

Docket: 88-42
Citation: 493 U.S. 20 (1989)
Petitioner: Hallstrom
Respondent: Tillamook County

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, October 4, 1989
Decision: Tuesday, November 7, 1989
Issues: Economic Activity, Natural Resources

Advocates

Kim T. Buckley (on behalf of the Petitioners)
I. Franklin Hunsaker (on behalf of the Respondent)
Brian J. Martin (as amicus curiae supporting the Respondent)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for Tillamook County, 2 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 42 U.S.C. 6972
Wrote a dissent
Marshall
Voted with the minority, joined Marshall's dissent
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Hallstrom v. Tillamook County, 493 U.S. 20 (1989),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_42/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement