Home › Cases › 1980-1989 › 1989 › Hallstrom v. Tillamook County ›

Hallstrom v. Tillamook County

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
Kim T. Buckley (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Brian J. Martin (as amicus curiae supporting the Respondent)
I. Franklin Hunsaker (on behalf of the Respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
88-42
Petitioner: 
Hallstrom
Respondent: 
Tillamook County
Decided By: 
Rehnquist Court (1988-1990)
Opinion: 
493 U.S. 20 (1989)
Argued: 
Wednesday, October 4, 1989
Decided: 
Tuesday, November 7, 1989
Issues: 
Economic Activity, Natural Resources; Judicial Power, Jurisdiction of Federal Courts

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Hallstrom v. Tillamook County , 493 U.S. 20 (1989)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_42)
(last visited Saturday, November 21, 2009).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Tillamook County, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 42 U.S.C. 6972

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the minority, joined Marshall's dissent
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a dissent
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy

Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor