Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1989» Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm'n of Illinois

Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm'n of Illinois

Docket: 88-1775
Citation: 496 U.S. 91 (1990)
Petitioner: Peel
Respondent: Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm'n of Illinois

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, January 17, 1990
Decision: Monday, June 4, 1990
Issues: Attorneys, Commercial Speech

Advocates

Bruce J. Ennis, Jr. (on behalf of the Petitioner)
Steven J. Marzen (on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
William F. Moran, III (on behalf of the Respondent)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Peel, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly
Wrote a special concurrence
Marshall
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's concurrence
Brennan
Wrote the judgment of the Court
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote a dissent
White
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Scalia
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Rehnquist
Judgment of the Court by Justice John Paul Stevens

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm'n of Illinois, 496 U.S. 91 (1990),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_1775/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement