Home › Cases › 1980-1989 › 1989 › Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm'n of Illinois ›

Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm'n of Illinois

Media Items
Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm'n of Illinois - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
Bruce J. Ennis, Jr. (on behalf of the Petitioner)
Steven J. Marzen (on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
William F. Moran, III (on behalf of the Respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
88-1775
Petitioner: 
Peel
Respondent: 
Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm'n of Illinois
Decided By: 
Rehnquist Court (1988-1990)
Opinion: 
496 U.S. 91 (1990)
Argued: 
Wednesday, January 17, 1990
Decided: 
Monday, June 4, 1990
Issues: 
Attorneys, Commercial Speech

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Comm'n of Illinois , 496 U.S. 91 (1990)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_1775)
(last visited Tuesday, November 24, 2009).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Peel, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's concurrence
Brennan
Wrote a dissent
White
Wrote a special concurrence
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote the judgment of the Court
Stevens
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy

Judgment of the Court by Justice John Paul Stevens