Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Kenneth W. Starr (Argued the cause for the United States)
Jay A. Sekulow (Argued the cause for the private respondents)
Allen E. Daubman (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
88-1597
Petitioner: 
BOE of Westside Community Schools
Respondent: 
Mergens
Opinion: 
496 U.S. 226 (1990)
Categories: 
freedom of association, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, first amendment

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens , 496 U.S. 226 (1990)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_1597)
Facts of the Case: 

The school administration at Westside High School denied permission to a group of students to form a Christian club with the same privileges and meeting terms as other Westside after-school student clubs. In addition to citing the Establishment Clause, Westside refused the club's formation because it lacked a faculty sponsor. When the school board upheld the administration's denial, Mergens and several other students sued. The students alleged that Westside's refusal violated the Equal Access Act, which requiremes that schools in receipt of federal funds provide "equal access" to student groups seeking to express "religious, political, philosophical, or other content" messages. On appeal from an adverse District Court ruling, the Court of Appeals found in favor of the students. The Supreme Court granted Westside certiorari.

Question: 

Was Westside's prohibition against the formation of a Christian club consistent with the Establishment Clause, thereby rendering the Equal Access Act unconstitutional?

Conclusion: 

No. In distinguishing between "curriculum" and "noncurriculum student groups," the Court held that since Westside permitted other noncurricular clubs, it was prohibited under the Equal Access Act from denying equal access to any after-school club based on the content of its speech. The proposed Christian club would be a noncurriculum group since no other course required students to become its members, its subject matter would not actually be taught in classes, it did not concern the school's cumulative body of courses, and its members would not receive academic credit for their participation. The Court added that the Equal Access Act was constitutional because it served an overriding secular purpose by prohibiting discrimination on the basis of philosophical, political, or other types of speech. As such, the Act protected the Christian club's formation even if its members engaged in religious discussions.

Decisions

Decision: 8 votes for Mergens, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 20 U.S.C. 4071

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's concurrence
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a special concurrence
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority, joined Kennedy's concurrence
Scalia
Wrote a special concurrence
Kennedy

Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor