Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1989» Franchise Tax Board Of California v. Alcan Aluminium

Franchise Tax Board Of California v. Alcan Aluminium

Docket: 88-1400
Citation: 493 U.S. 331 (1990)
Petitioner: Franchise Tax Board Of California
Respondent: Alcan Aluminium

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, November 1, 1989
Decision: Wednesday, January 10, 1990
Issues: Judicial Power, Comity, Civil Procedure

Advocates

Timothy G. Laddish (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Lawrence A. Salibra, II (on behalf of the Respondent)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Franchise Tax Board Of California, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 3, Section 2, Paragraph 1: Case or Controversy Requirement
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote the majority opinion
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Full Opinion by Justice Byron R. White

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Franchise Tax Board Of California v. Alcan Aluminium, 493 U.S. 331 (1990),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_1400/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement