Community For Creative Non-Violence v. Reid

Media Items
Community For Creative Non-Violence v. Reid - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Joshua Kaufman (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Lawrence S. Robbins (Argued the cause for the Register of Copyrights as amicus curiae urging affirmance)
Robert Alan Garrett (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
88-293
Petitioner: 
Community For Creative Non-Violence
Respondent: 
Reid
Opinion: 
490 U.S. 730 (1989)
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Community For Creative Non-Violence v. Reid , 490 U.S. 730 (1989)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1988/1988_88_293)
Facts of the Case: 

The Community for Creative Non-Violence (CCNV) made an oral agreement with James Reid, a sculptor, to produce a statue depicting the plight of the homeless for display at a 1985 Washington D.C. Christmas pageant. Upon completion, delivery, and joining of the work to a base that it prepared separately, CCNV paid Reid the final installment of the agreed-upon price. Shortly thereafter, the parties filed competing copyright claims over the sculpture. Holding, in accordance with the Copyright Act of 1976 (the "Act"), that the statue was a "work made for hire," a district court ruled in favor of CCNV. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed and the Supreme Court granted CCNV certiorari.

Question: 

Is the making of a sculpture for an organization, by someone who contracts with the organization but is not its employee, a "work made for hire" as defined by the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. Section 101?

Conclusion: 

No. In a unanimous opinion, the Court held that the statue's preparation was not a "work for hire" as defined by the Act because Reid was not a CCNV employee. Instead, CCNV hired Reid as an independent contractor. Reid's independent status was evident because he supplied his own tools, worked in his own studio in another city, was retained for less than two months, decided his own work schedule, received salary that was contingent on the sculpture's completion, and had sole discretion over hiring and paying assistants. Moreover, CCNV did not pay social security taxes for Reid nor did it provide him any employee benefits.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Reid, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 17 U.S.C. 101

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote the majority opinion
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy

Full Opinion by Justice Thurgood Marshall

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court