The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, March 21, 1989
Decision: Wednesday, June 21, 1989
Issues: First Amendment, Protest Demonstrations
Categories: criminal, first amendment, flag desecration, freedom of speech
Tags: Rehnquist: Freedom of Speech, Rehnquist on iTunes U

Advocates

Kathi Alyce Drew (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
William M. Kunstler (Argued the cause for the respondent)

Facts of the Case

In 1984, in front of the Dallas City Hall, Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag as a means of protest against Reagan administration policies. Johnson was tried and convicted under a Texas law outlawing flag desecration. He was sentenced to one year in jail and assessed a $2,000 fine. After the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction, the case went to the Supreme Court.

Question

Is the desecration of an American flag, by burning or otherwise, a form of speech that is protected under the First Amendment?

Conclusion

In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that Johnson's burning of a flag was protected expression under the First Amendment. The Court found that Johnson's actions fell into the category of expressive conduct and had a distinctively political nature. The fact that an audience takes offense to certain ideas or expression, the Court found, does not justify prohibitions of speech. The Court also held that state officials did not have the authority to designate symbols to be used to communicate only limited sets of messages, noting that "[i]f there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable."

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Johnson, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly
Wrote a dissent
Rehnquist
Wrote the majority opinion
Brennan
Voted with the minority, joined Rehnquist's dissent
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the minority, joined Rehnquist's dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote a regular concurrence
Kennedy
Full Opinion by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1988/1988_88_155/>
(last visited ).