Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1988» Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch

Docket: 87-1054
Citation: 489 U.S. 101 (1989)
Petitioner: Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Respondent: Bruch

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, November 30, 1988
Decision: Tuesday, February 21, 1989
Issues: Economic Activity, Employee Retirement Income Security Act

Advocates

David Silberman (on behalf of the Respondents)
Christopher J. Wright (as Amicus Curiae supporting Respondents)
Martin Wald (on behalf of the Petitioners)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Bruch, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Employee Retirement Income Security
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Wrote a regular concurrence
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101 (1989),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1988/1988_87_1054/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement