Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1987» Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.

Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.

Docket: 87-505
Citation: 486 U.S. 140 (1988)
Petitioner: Chick Kam Choo
Respondent: Exxon Corp.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, March 30, 1988
Decision: Monday, May 16, 1988
Issues: Economic Activity, Election of Remedies

Advocates

James P. Cooney (on behalf of the Respondent)
Benton Musslewhite (on behalf of the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Chick Kam Choo, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 28 U.S.C. 2283
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote a regular concurrence
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp., 486 U.S. 140 (1988),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_87_505/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement