Home › Cases › 1980-1989 › 1987 › D. H. Holmes Co. v. McNamara ›

D. H. Holmes Co. v. McNamara

Media Items
D. H. Holmes Co. v. Mcnamara - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Expanded View
Download MP3
Advocates
Andrew Rinker, Jr. (on behalf of the appellant)
Robert G. Pugh (on behalf of the appellee)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
87-267
Appellant: 
D. H. Holmes Co.
Appellee: 
McNamara
Decided By: 
Rehnquist Court (1988-1990)
Opinion: 
486 U.S. 24 (1988)
Argued: 
Tuesday, March 22, 1988
Decided: 
Monday, May 16, 1988
Issues: 
Economic Activity, State Tax

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, D. H. Holmes Co. v. McNamara , 486 U.S. 24 (1988)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_87_267)
(last visited Thursday, November 26, 2009).
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Mcnamara, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 3: Interstate Commerce Clause

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy

Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist