Morrison v. Olson

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Thomas S. Martin (on behalf of Appellees)
Alexia Morrison (on behalf of the Appellant)
Charles Fried (as amicus curiae, supporting Appellees)
Michael Davidson (as amicus curiae, supporting Appellant)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
87-1279
Appellee: 
Olson
Appellant: 
Morrison
Opinion: 
487 U.S. 654 (1988)
Categories: 
separation of powers, justiciability

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Morrison v. Olson , 487 U.S. 654 (1988)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_87_1279)
Facts of the Case: 

The Ethics in Government Act of 1978 created a special court and empowered the Attorney General to recommend to that court the appointment of an "independent counsel" to investigate, and, if necessary, prosecute government officials for certain violations of federal criminal laws.

Question: 

Did the Act violate the constitutional principal of separation of powers?

Conclusion: 

The Court addressed a number of constitutional issues in this case and upheld the law. The near-unanimous Court held that the means of selecting the independent counsel did not violate the Appointments Clause; the powers allocated to the special court did not violate Article III; and the Act was not offensive to the separation of powers doctrine since it did not impermissibly interfere with the functions of the Executive Branch.

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Morrison, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 28 U.S.C. 49

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Did not participate
Kennedy

Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist