Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1987» Tulsa Professional Collection Services v. Pope

Tulsa Professional Collection Services v. Pope

Docket: 86-1961
Citation: 485 U.S. 478 (1988)
Appellant: Tulsa Professional Collection Services
Appellee: Pope

Case Media

Abstract

Oral Argument: Wednesday, March 2, 1988
Decision: Tuesday, April 19, 1988
Issues: Due Process, Hearing or Notice

Advocates

Randall E. Rose (on behalf of the Appellant)
Phillip K. Smith (on behalf of the Appellees)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Full Opinion: Due Process, Hearing or Notice: 8 - 1
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's opinion
Marshall
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's opinion
Brennan
Voted with the majority, concurred with O'Connor's opinion
Blackmun
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's opinion
Stevens
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's opinion
White
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the majority, authored an opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's opinion
Scalia
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Rehnquist

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Tulsa Professional Collection Services v. Pope, 485 U.S. 478 (1988),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_86_1961/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement