Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1987» Tulsa Professional Collection Services v. Pope

Tulsa Professional Collection Services v. Pope

Docket: 86-1961
Citation: 485 U.S. 478 (1988)
Appellant: Tulsa Professional Collection Services
Appellee: Pope

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, March 2, 1988
Decision: Tuesday, April 19, 1988
Issues: Due Process, Hearing or Notice

Advocates

Randall E. Rose (on behalf of the Appellant)
Phillip K. Smith (on behalf of the Appellees)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 8 votes for Tulsa Professional Collection Services, 1 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Due Process
Wrote a dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Tulsa Professional Collection Services v. Pope, 485 U.S. 478 (1988),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_86_1961/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement