Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1987» Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Ser

Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Ser

Docket: 86-1387
Citation: 486 U.S. 825 (1988)
Petitioner: Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Ser

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, April 19, 1988
Decision: Friday, June 17, 1988
Issues: Federalism, Federal Preemption of State Regulation

Advocates

Brian J. Martin (as amicus curiae, supporting Petitioners)
Ernest L. Mathews, Jr. (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Maureen E. Mahoney (as amicus curiae, supporting judgment below)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Lanier Collection Agency & Ser, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Employee Retirement Income Security
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
White
Wrote a dissent
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice Byron R. White

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Ser, 486 U.S. 825 (1988),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_86_1387/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement