Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Ser

Media Items
Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Ser - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Ernest L. Mathews, Jr. (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Brian J. Martin (as amicus curiae, supporting Petitioners)
Maureen E. Mahoney (as amicus curiae, supporting judgment below)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
86-1387
Petitioner: 
Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Ser
Opinion: 
486 U.S. 825 (1988)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Ser , 486 U.S. 825 (1988)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_86_1387)
Facts of the Case: 

None

Question: 

None

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Lanier Collection Agency & Ser, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote the majority opinion
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Scalia
Wrote a dissent
Kennedy

Full Opinion by Justice Byron R. White