United States v. Paradise

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
J. Richard Cohen (on behalf of the respondent)
Charles Fried (on behalf of the petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
85-999
Petitioner: 
United States
Respondent: 
Paradise
Opinion: 
480 U.S. 149 (1987)
Categories: 
affirmative action, government employment, race discrimination

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, United States v. Paradise , 480 U.S. 149 (1987)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_999)
Facts of the Case: 

In response to a series of NAACP-initiated lawsuits in the 1970s, the Alabama Department of Public Safety was required to implement a promotion scheme in which half of the department's promotions to certain ranks would go to black officers if enough qualified blacks were available.

Question: 

Did the one-black-for-one-white promotion scheme violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion: 

In a plurality opinion, the Court upheld the promotion plan. The scheme did not impose an "absolute bar" to white advancement, was narrowly drawn to include only specific ranks in the department, and, according to the four justices who voted to affirm it, was "required in light of the Department's long and shameful record of delay and resistance" in complying with past judicial decisions. It is important to remember that courts had first found the Department's practices unconstitutional in 1972.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Paradise, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Equal Protection

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Rehnquist
Wrote the judgment of the Court
Brennan
Wrote a dissent
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote a regular concurrence
Powell
Wrote a special concurrence
Stevens
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Scalia

Judgment of the Court by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.