Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida

Media Items
Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n Of Fla. - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n Of Fla. - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Walter E. Carson (on behalf of the appellant)
John D. Maher (on behalf of the appellee)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
85-993
Appellee: 
Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida et al.
Appellant: 
Paula Hobbie
Opinion: 
480 U.S. 136 (1987)
Categories: 
states, freedom of religion, first amendment, social security

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida , 480 U.S. 136 (1987)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_993)
Facts of the Case: 

Paula Hobbie worked for Lawton and Company, a Florida jewelry shop. She joined the Seventh-day Adventist Church and informed her employer that she could not work from sundown on Friday to sundown on Saturday since it was her new church's Sabbath day. Lawton soon dismissed her for refusing to work Friday evening and Saturday shifts. Hobbie filed for unemployment compensation with the Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security. Lawton objected to paying benefits, claiming that she did qualify since she had been dismissed "for misconduct connected with her work." The Bureau of Unemployment Compensation agreed and denied her benefits. Hobbie claimed that this violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. She unsuccessfully appealed the decision in the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal.

Question: 

Did the state of Florida violate the Free Exercise Clause by denying unemployment benefits to an employee who was dismissed for refusing to work certain shifts because of conflicting religious obligations?

Conclusion: 

Yes. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. delivered the opinion for an 8-1 court. Referring to its similar decisions in Sherbert v. Verner and Thomas v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Security Div., the Court maintained that a state cannot deny unemployment benefits to an employee dismissed for having religious conflicts with the employer. This violates the Free Exercise Clause by pressuring religious adherents to modify their religious views in order to retain work or benefits. The state cannot do this without a compelling interest. The Court did not find it relevant that Hobbie converted after she began working, and did not consider the fact that she still qualified for partial benefits a satisfactory remedy.

Decisions

Decision: 8 votes for Hobbie, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Free Exercise of Religion

Sort by Ideology

Wrote a dissent
Rehnquist
Wrote the majority opinion
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote a special concurrence
Powell
Wrote a special concurrence
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia

Full Opinion by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.