Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1980-1989» 1986» Connecticut v. Barrett

Connecticut v. Barrett

Docket: 85-899
Citation: 479 U.S. 523 (1987)
Petitioner: Connecticut
Respondent: Barrett

Case Media

Abstract

Oral Argument: Tuesday, December 9, 1986
Decision: Tuesday, January 27, 1987
Issues: Criminal Procedure, Miranda Warnings

Advocates

Julia Dicocco Dewey (on behalf of the petitioner)
Robert L. Genuario (on behalf of the respondent)
Charles A. Rothfeld (as amicus curiae, supporting petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

 Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Full Opinion: Criminal Procedure, Miranda Warnings: 7 - 2
Disagreed with grant, joined Stevens' dissent from grant
Marshall
Voted with the majority, authored a special concurrence
Brennan
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
Blackmun
Disagreed with grant, authored a dissent from grant
Stevens
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
Powell
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
White
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
Scalia
Voted with the majority, authored an opinion
Rehnquist

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 U.S. 523 (1987),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_899/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement